August 5th, 2011

Mobile? It’s much more than that

What the hell is “mobile?”

Lets put a stop to labeling, shall we? Blame it on politics, the media or pop culture, but as a society we’re obsessed with having a buzz word for everything.

When I started out in design, photoshop could solve all image ills.

Then, for a while there, aol was the Internet.

The Internet became super cool (and O’reilly became super rich) when web 2.0 ruled.

Now we’re off on “mobile.” It’s the “in” thing.

But like the rest of the labels, it’s sadly lacking in both meaning and accuracy. To some extent, every computer you own is mobile. Even the lowly home PC is mobile if you’re ambitious enough, and if you’re not, PCs almost not worth talking about – they’re losing relevancy faster than Paris Hilton.

So when you say mobile what do you mean? It’s not a trick question or a stupid one. Is it a laptop? A netbook? A tablet? A smart phone? A feature phone? An iPod? A watch? Or some combination of the above? Any one of them is quite mobile.

If we have to name them, lets try to be more specific. How about that. Let’s start labeling by capabilities, not portability. Let’s label by interaction type and size. Perhaps we can even imply some behaviors and usage patterns. How about this? Why not use device categories?

When people say “mobile,” don’t most mean “touch?”

Let’s do every senior exec in big business a favor and rid ourselves of at least one ambiguous buzzword. Let’s stop calling it mobile. (They can have html5.)

July 7th, 2010

I’ve Been Put on a Pedestal by Mass High Tech Business News

In other very exciting news, I’ve been featured in Galen Moore’s Mass High Tech article New England software experts put UI/UX specialists on a pedestal.

I love how he describes the “new” importance of having a great product experience:

The increased demand for good design, which began with the iPhone and online social networks and games, has come to the call center and the shopping mall security desk. Developers must try to predict how a human will use even the most mundane applications. As it turns out, that’s not an easy thing to do. Combining user focus with a good aesthetic eye? Near impossible. The UI or UX designer has a seat at the head of the table, and companies are under pressure to fill it with the best talent possible.

Thanks to Galen for the nice write up and the fine folks at Viximo who recommended me for the article.

July 7th, 2010

Free Range User Advocate

Wow. It’s been a long time since I’ve posted anything. I need to get better at that. I guess that’s what happens when you get a full time gig.

Well, that’s all changed. I’ve gone free range again. And I’m open for new projects, new adventures and new experiences. Pun intended.

So, anyway, if you’re looking for a user advocate let’s talk.

February 7th, 2009

Not much Latitude – why “always on” will never take off

There’s been a lot of talk this week about Google’s new friend finding service, Latitude. As expected, there are two camps in the debate around the service: those people who think it’s awesome (they likely think everything else Google has ever done is awesome, too) and those who think Latitude is the perfect tool to enable stalkers to track down and eat their children and/or significant other.

I fall into neither camp.

Frankly, I think the stalking angle is totally overblown. Every story I’ve heard in the mainstream media about stalking via a mobile device goes something like this: A girl breaks up with her emo boyfriend. Said emo boyfriend suddenly knows everything his ex-girlfriend is doing. He says he can track her every move via her mobile phone, even when it’s off, so, like don’t try turning it off, because he can totally track her. And, you know, he just really loves her and everything and he’s not really stalking, because it’s love, right? He just wants to get back together!

The parents believe this is possible because they don’t really get the technology – they know it has GPS that can provide location so the leap to a kid who obviously understand technology better hacking into the phone isn’t a huge one. The kid believes it because, well, she’s a kid and probably thinks Law and Order is a pretty accurate slice-of-life-for-a-cop show.

More likely, the truth is he’s hiding in the bushes at night and showing up where she is because he’s physically stalking her with only the technology of a car or a bicycle. I spent the past three years with some ubersmart people making location aware mobile apps and I’ll tell ya, if they couldn’t hack into my phone or my phone’s network to locate me, the chance of your daughter’s obsessive techy boyfriend doing it is about zero. Seriously, play the lottery. You have better chances.

Then we have the “awesome camp” who think that friend finding, as an idea, is pretty darn cool. They see the possibilities of it. They imagine reliving college days always knowing where their friends are. They’d always know where the best party was because if their friends are all in the same place, its a good bet that’s a good party. That would be awesome.

There’s a million use cases they make just like that. My spouse wants to know where I am so s/he can start dinner at the correct time. My buddy wants to see if I’m at the bar yet, or if s/he has more time. My parents want to know if I’m home so they can call me and come see their grandchild. Etc. Etc. Etc.

The problem is that there is a big non-stalker related downside to always on. For all the millions of ways it makes life easier, at some point or another everyone – everyone – does something that they don’t want someone else to find out about. At the college party my girlfriend could be cheating on me. As I’m on my way home, I could be stopping to get a present for my wife right as she’s finding me and it could ruin the surprise (or worse, bring up pointless arguments). As for my parents, even though I’m home, I may not want them coming over.

In each case, once the friend finder bites me, everyone involved in the mishap has to make a decision about their future with the service. It comes down to this: what’s easier, changing habits so that I turn off the finder every time I do something “secret,” or just discontinuing the service? It’s a simple decision. Friend finders don’t really fulfill a need, they just make finding friends or loved ones a tad bit more convenient than making phone call, texting a message or emailing someone to collect the same information. And with Friend Finding, the risk of getting caught far outweighs the benefits, so I opt out. Once this happens to enough people, the critical mass (assuming there is one) disappears and the service as a whole becomes useless.

So, good for Google joining Loopt, Brightkite and Loki in the buddy finding parade. I predict the same fate for Latitude as their Dodgeball service – a shiny, seemed-like-a-good-idea-at-the-time addition to the Google scrap heap.

January 16th, 2009

Usability Experience Specialist One of the Best Jobs of 2009? Really?

So US News and World Report, the purveyor of fine business/college related lists, has made a list of the “30 careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.” And what made the list? Well, Usability Experience Specialist, of course.

Really?  I mean, seriously?

I’ve secretly always considered my profession to be the Rodney Dangerfield of occupations.  Until, say, the last three years it seemed that for most businesses building a useable product was an afterthought. Technology and developers seemed to carry the process of product development.  It was as if management teams thought: I’ve got a great technology and great developers, so why wouldn’t this produce a great product?

I credit two big things with this seismic shift from a developer oriented product cycle to one driven by user experience: web 2.0 and the iPhone.  Companies like 37signals built great products with that were surprisingly powerful wrapped in a simple to use minimalist design. On the phone side, Apple showed that a phone doesn’t have to be limitted by a numeric keypad and a small screen, but instead can have a rich graphical interface with only 4 physical buttons.   Both of these put the emphasis not only on great technology and the developers behind it, but have also shown a spotlight on how a great user experience and putting the user first can make an incredible difference.

So, as surprised as I am to see my profession finally gaining some deserved praise, I’m happy not only for the UX/UI practitioners out there, but for every person who buys a gadget or engages with a web app in the coming year. Friendly products are ahead!

[thanks to Jenny Chang's UX Minute Blog for drawing my attention to it.  Had she not added Drync Wine to your clippings, I never would have stumbled upon it! Hooray social media!]

January 6th, 2009

Public Radio Tuner 1.1 Released

 Public Radio Tuner 1.1I was super excited to get involved in this project as the “user experience” part of the team. To me, as a huge NPR fan, this is the ultimate iPhone application – it streams tons and tons of stations directly to your iPhone!   It’s the one app I wish I had when I used to do the train slog from Worcester to Boston.  So, it may come as no surprise that I’m proud to announce that the new version of the “official NPR” player is now out. Check out the official announcement.  

This is a significant upgrade from the previous version (of which I was not a part) and includes 

  • Bookmarking of favorite stations
  • Local stations (based on your current location)
  • Search station or browse them by State
  • Now playing indicator that quickly brings you back to the currently playing station

Like I said, I’m proud to be part of this release.  Download the Public Radio Tuner now at the App Store!


Eric Sagalyn, User Advocate.

Ouch. IE6.

Did you know that IE6 is over 10 years old. It's time to upgrade. Like most modern web applications, this site won't work with IE6.